Plating M1–M1.4: the tolerance sets nothing aside

The short version: ISO 965-2 puts external threads from M1 to M1.4 at 6h, and the fundamental deviation at h is zero. There is no allowance built in for a coating. A drawing that says only “M1.2 external, zinc plated” can produce parts that will not gauge after plating — and the problem is in the drawing, not the plating shop.

A coating adds four times its thickness to pitch diameter

This is the step most often skipped. The coating sits on both flanks, and pitch diameter is measured across the thread, so the geometry gives:

On a 60° external thread, a single-side coating thickness of t increases pitch diameter by 4t.

Five microns of zinc therefore costs twenty microns of pitch diameter. On M8 that is usually absorbed without thought.

Section through a 60-degree thread: black is the profile before plating, red is the outer surface after plating; a single-side thickness t lifts the pitch line by 2t, giving 4t across the diameter
The coating grows normal to each flank by t, lifting the pitch line by 2t; across the diameter that is 4t.

The constraint is not band width. It is where the band sits.

It is tempting to compare coating growth against the tolerance band and conclude the band is too narrow. That is the wrong test, and at these sizes it gives the wrong answer. An M1.2×0.25-6h external thread has a pitch diameter band roughly 53 μm wide, so twenty microns does not consume it.

The real constraint is that position h has zero upper deviation. Position g carries a negative fundamental deviation, and that negative value is where plating normally lives. At h there is no such space, so a thread produced near maximum material has nowhere to put the coating.

The criterion is therefore worst-case pitch diameter after plating, verified with a GO gauge after plating — not a comparison of coating thickness against band width.

ISO 4042 Annex D: the theoretical maximum is thinner than expected

Annex D lists the theoretical maximum coating thickness by pitch and by the tolerance position before coating. Two examples close to our range:

ISO 4042:2022 Annex D — theoretical maximum, external thread
SizePitch PositionTheoretical max.
M1.60.35g4 μm
M20.4g4 μm
M1 – M1.40.25 – 0.36h— none set aside

4 μm is theoretical. Two things eat into it:

  • Thickness distribution. Electroplating is not uniform, and rack and barrel plating distribute very differently. A specified average tells you little.
  • The dog-bone effect. Current density is higher at edges and ends, so the coating runs thicker there — on the crest and the first few threads, which is exactly the part that has to enter the hole first.

Small parts are not less prone to hydrogen embrittlement

The intuition is that a small part has more surface per unit volume, so hydrogen escapes more easily and the bake can be shortened. ISO 4042 grants no such exception.

  • Below M6, pickling is sometimes the only viable cleaning route — and pickling is a principal way hydrogen gets in.
  • In a thin section the hardened layer occupies a larger fraction of the whole, which may increase susceptibility rather than reduce it.
  • Shortening a bake requires sustained-load testing or process qualification, not reasoning from geometry.

ISO 4042 and ASTM B850 do not use the same classification and must not be mixed. ISO works from hardness (core above 390 HV is treated as susceptible) with typical conditions of 190–220 °C for 8–10 h, and states that 185–195 °C for four hours is generally insufficient — with the time counted from when the whole load reaches temperature, not from when it entered the oven. ASTM classifies by actual tensile strength instead.

What to put on the drawing

  • Thread callout with tolerance position and class, not just “M1.2”
  • Whether the tolerance applies before or after coating — the most disputed item of the lot
  • For M1–M1.4 with plating, an explicit allowance: a pre-plating pitch diameter maximum, or a stated post-plating GO gauge requirement
  • Acceptance as GO gauge after plating, not a thickness report alone
  • For high-strength parts (core above 390 HV), the bake conditions and when the clock starts

None of this shows up at sample stage, which is why it bites late. Samples are often unplated, or plated in a small well-controlled batch. It surfaces on the first production lot.

References

Standards are paid documents. Figures follow the clauses cited; the current edition governs. Purchase and acceptance should rest on the drawing agreement and the standard itself, not on this page.

Enquiries

If your drawing falls between M1.0 and M5.0 and calls for plating, send it over. We will tell you whether the tolerance allocation works before we quote — which costs a great deal less than finding out on the first production lot.

sales@screwkingtw.com